Homosecular Gaytheist

25 June 2009

Now, Back to Important Things

Filed under: Gay Rights, Religion — Rev. J. Reed Braden @ 6:56 pm

An update on the gay exorcism story: CNN scored an interview with the pastor of the church that performed an exorcism on an allegedly gay member who looked like a teenager or a young adult.

This looks long and outrageous, so I’m going to semi-liveblog my reaction.

The beginning of the video.  The host said the video shows, “a young man being ministered to, I suppose.”  No you do not suppose!  You see a young man being held down, beaten and yelled at by a delusional cult of retards!  If that’s what we call the ministry these days, no wonder why the Christian church is in trouble with keeping asses in seats!

First question was when it happened.  Patricia McKinney, the pastor, wasn’t sure when she held down the homosexual, beat him and screamed that he was possessed by a demon.  Funny… that seems like an event you would remember clearly if it was a one-time deal.

She is whoring and advertising for her church rather than answering the question of if the man wanted to be beaten, shout at and sexually harassed.

Now she answers:  “All of a sudden, he hits the floor.”  THEN CALL A MOTHERFUCKING AMBULANCE YOU IGNORANT CHRISTTARD!  Falling to the ground and shaking violently does not mean, “I’m gay. Heal me.”  It means, “I’m having a SEIZURE!  Call the fucking paramedics!”

Now she says he came into the church (doesn’t put it on the timeline with the filmed incident) and said he didn’t want to live the life of a gay man.  Why the sudden change of story?

The next saying I hear echoed a lot from family and those who surround me where I live and it really boils my blood:  “Manifested Glory is not against homosexuality.  We do not hate them.  We don’t come up against them.  We just don’t believe in their lifestyle.”

Pause.

Let’s replace some words to make a point.  The following does not reflect what I actually believe.

I am not against the nigger community.  I don’t hate them.  I don’t come out against them.  I just don’t believe in the niggers’ lifestyle.

Anyone who can explain how my statement is any different from hers gets a cookie.

Being gay is not a lifestyle, any more than being black is.  Yes, there is a stereotypical lifestyle that some gay men participate in that involves fashion, pride parades and celebrity trash news, but that is not what it means to be gay.  And that’s not what she is talking about either.

Whenever you hear someone saying that they don’t agree with, “the homosexual lifestyle,” they are saying that they hate homosexuality.  If you dosed this bitch with sodium thiopental and interrogated her, you’d come out with the truth, that she is disgusted by gay people and she shares the same virulent hatred that her parents and grandparents faced from white racists.  Her hatred is just targeted at gay people instead of black people.

They use the word lifestyle because it sounds like something you choose.  And the irony is this:  The people who say that homosexuality is a choice are often the best evidence against that idea.  Why would I choose to be gay if the world is full of Pat Robertsons, George Bushes and Patricia McKinneys who will hate and discriminate against me for that choice?  Their very existence disproves their own argument.

Patricia McKinney may not hate certain gay people, but she hates them in general.

Carrying on.

If you are gay, “You can come in our church, but you can not live that lifestyle in our church.”  Remember, “live that lifestyle” means “be gay.”  You can not join the church if you are gay.  It’s discriminatory.  It loses tax exemption.  Call the IRS.

The host asks for further clarification and she states that the only way a gay person can be a member is if they are “cured” first.

“We do not like the lifestyle of a man with a man or a woman with a woman, and that’s our beliefs[sic].”  Funny.  My sister told me the same thing when I asked her why she voted to ban me from getting married.

All people, even gays, are allowed to come into the church, but they have to, “get delivered.”  As we saw in the video, the “delivery” of a gay man looks just like a lynch mob.

The fat bitch is comparing homosexuality with alcoholism, crack cocaine and adultery.

She just said that she’s a prophet who, “declares the word of the lord.”  The word of the lord has gone down the tubes a loooooooooong way since the Old Testament.  She hasn’t uttered a single sentence so far that would pass a 1st grade grammar test.

Oh… she’s a recovering crack and heroine addict.  That explains everything.  I’m done with her.  I don’t waste my time refuting the delusions and spiritual hallucinations of drug users.  When half of your brain cells are dead, I have nothing rational to discuss with you.

(Via The Gay Atheist)

10 Comments »

  1. Praise! My ass. I only saw part of the video… I couldn’t watch the rest. Thanks for breaking it down. Found your blog recently and lurk here on occasion. (I used to blog but gave it up about a year ago. Move along. Nothing to see here.) I’m afflicted with teh ghey and a longtime antitheist too! Keep spreading the word. Catch up with you later.

    Comment by Steve — 25 June 2009 @ 7:29 pm

  2. I want a cookie. One of the statements is socially acceptable. Boom!

    Comment by Bryan — 26 June 2009 @ 8:41 am

    • No. Neither are. You will offend more with the latter, but they’re both offense–one of the points I was trying to make. Boom!

      Comment by Rev. J. Reed Braden — 26 June 2009 @ 2:36 pm

      • The point I was trying to make is, she said that on CNN, and there’s no outrage. Imagine how many letters and call and emails would be sent in if she had said the one you came up with. Bashing on gays is acceptable in society, bashing on blacks isn’t. Not to say either is okay.

        Comment by Bryan — 26 June 2009 @ 2:54 pm

        • Right. Still no cookie.

          Comment by Rev. J. Reed Braden — 26 June 2009 @ 3:02 pm

          • How about if I say please?

            Pretty pretty please with blowjobs on top?

            Comment by Bryan — 26 June 2009 @ 3:11 pm

          • You explained how they are different in reception, not how the phrases and the feelings behind the phrase are inherently different. If I gave out cookies for every semantic detail (one has more g’s in it), I would do nothing all day but bake cookies.

            Comment by Rev. J. Reed Braden — 26 June 2009 @ 3:14 pm

          • Well, there is no difference in the intent. I’ll be the first to get up on a soapbox and shout about the black woman on CNN is a prejudiced cunt with no sense of hypocrisy (or irony, for that matter).

            Comment by Bryan — 26 June 2009 @ 3:16 pm

  3. If anyone saw the Colbert Report, he roasted this one good. Now there’s a gay demon (the one that’s been exorcised) on the loose.
    Trying to piss of gays and skeptics all at once, eh?
    Heh heh, “CHRISTTARD!”
    That’s as funny as calling the bible belt “dumbfuckistan.”

    Sarah, Not My God

    Comment by Sarah Trachtenberg — 26 June 2009 @ 11:33 am

  4. also happy to read-read blog
    always successful

    Comment by ivenxadytia — 18 July 2009 @ 11:09 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.