Couldn’t have said it better myself…

Furthermore, I do think all those arguments could be used by atheists just as well. People say they believe in the Bible when they don’t even know what it says. Showing such faulty logic sure is an argument against religion. The old “you don’t even know what you’re talking about, shut up” that many of us have already had to say.

And I do agree with what was said above, that gays have to read past the lines to see things that concern them. I could name a few dozens of movies, songs and books that have implications like that.

My point is: the more disperse we are, the less strength we have. Although it is a bad example, Hitler didn’t think twice before making a pact with the soviets. Sometimes you can’t stop the pain, but you can make it hurt less.

For background: 12 years of Catholic schools, openly gay and partnered. Fuck you Bishop Tobin!

All major world religions believe in an omnipotent God with different names. Jesus, presented in many christian religions is presented as, “the son of God”. Jesus however still bears the title of prophet. Jesus said, as I and the father are one, so too are you one with the Father. The father being the one omnipotent God of all and about all creation. In Jesus represented as God is misleading without elaboration. The triune God is a trinity of three distinct persons, God the Father, the son and holy spirit. The son represents all of humanity as Jesus said and I quote earlier. Jesus is consubstantial with the Father meaning Jesus knows the mind of the father, and is part of the father in understanding his ways. In getting some insight of the mind of God I reference you to Charles Hartshorne and Alfred North Whitehead who posit God di-polar wherewith the mind of God is abstract, fixed, unchangeable being not having set emotions, love for one, and principles and concrete wherewith the mind of God is in flux. Humanity representing the flux, except those who have tabbed into the abstract mind of God are now more aware of God as the “mysterium tremendum”. Reference Rudolf Otto, John of the Cross and Saint Teresa of Avila and others in understanding this state while yet human. What I am bringing out here besides what I have already expressed is those who believe in God by other names, except in some major world religions think Jesus Christ is a prophet, not God. So should the world governments proceed in creating a hologram presenting Heavenly figures appearing before mankind seeing Jesus Christ many even Catholics think of Jesus Christ representing the father in the flesh. The operative word here is representing.

I will share another clairaudient clip herewith wherein I hear Jesus and king David mentioned in the same paragraph. Wherewith the name of Jesus is heard is said–”we have ransomed your life for the PROPHET JESUS”. I will not now go into the whole paragraph. The heavenlies who relayed this message to me refer to Jesus Christ as prophet.

Those in the world confusing the heck out of us do so, because they are not giving it to us straight. Jesus Christ gave it to us straight. In a time such as ours–they will say Jesus is hear, there, everywhere. Jesus said, DON’T BE FOOLED. You, God, Jesus, me all are one in the father. I reference you panentheism wherewith the concept is elaborated. Take care.

Also I wanted elaborating my close. Stay/be in the know. Many have heard, “the truth will set you free”.

I will share one more abstract experience with you. It follows quantum mechanic theory of sub-atomic particles. Recently I was looking after my mother-in-law, as my sister-in-law needed working, therewith needing someone looking in the physical safety of my aging mother-in-law. Upon arriving at the residence on a given morning, my sister law informed me my cell phone number rang her cell number ten times in a row. I checked my purse where my cell phone was in ascertaining the phone was not pressing against things which would cause it to ring someone number. However, I did not have my sister-in-laws number set a speed dial. Then my sister-in-law showed me a smiley which had been sent her. I thought wait a minute. It is already mystifying you received those then phone calls, and that you got a smiley confirms an electromagnetic willed experience, but I did not make those calls. To get to the smiley I need first selecting the recipients number, then moving through files to get to the smiley, then press send while the cursor is pointed at the smiley. There is no doubt about this was mystical. Take care. Stay/be in the know.

End sarcasm.

Seriously, kid. Get off your mommy’s computer and go fist-fuck a lava monster.

Homosexuals also have the right to engage in a heterosexual marriage, in terms of legal standing. It’s not that homosexuals “cannot get married at all”. It’s that we aren’t allowed to marry who we want to. Let’s get this clear – everyone can get married over the age of 18.

What needs to occur here is the de-coupling of the legal and religious constructs called Marriage. They are wholly different in the modern age. They used to be one thing, but now they are not. This de-coupling must first occur in natural dialog and terminology.

Marriage = Religious
Civil Union = Legal

“We got married” should refer to your spiritual experience of your religious wedding ceremony.
“We formed a civil union” should refer to your financial and legal status as a determined family unit. (For tax, property ownership, and other reasons)

Not everyone will do both. Most will, but the two acts should be conceived of as separate and talked about as nearly completely unrelated facts.

How heterosexuals can help: Have a Civil Union, by law. Not a “Marriage”. Relentlessly use the term Civil Union in place of Marriage when talking about the legal aspects of your relationship.
How homosexuals can help: Say “we got married” if you did, in fact, have a ceremony with friends and family. When people ask about the legal aspects, set them clear on what you have done or not done.

Just my thoughts.

What irritates me most about the “animal rights” movement is the deliberate targeting of scientific research as the primary culprit on animal “cruelty.”This is completely disgusting and should be penalized as if they were committing murder, which is essentially the indirect consequence of their irresponsible and irrational behavior. Why don’t they focus their energy on the industrialization of animal slaughter for food, which I agree is morbid and unnecessary, but can be overcome without the bullshit (provided that you make the right political adjustments and manage to overhaul this indifferent consumerist society.) Don’t get me wrong though, as this does not mean that they should take their idiotic shenanigans and begin destroying private property.

That being said, who the hell do these morons think they are? What gives them the right to declare what is “moral” and what isn’t, and advocate so-called “rights” for beings that cannot comprehend what that means? Does Peta (Pussies Engaging in Terrorist Activity) honestly believe that non-human animals deserve the same treatment as humans? Do they truly believe that they are our equals? If so, what makes them think that they have any say as to what should and shouldn’t be social policy? When is your date with Fido, Ingrid Newkirk? You nasty little trollop.

… will see you over at Gaytheists presently!